หลักสูตรวิศวกรรมศาสตรมหาบัณฑิต สาขาวิชาระบบขนส่งทางราง (หลักสูตรนานาชาติ) มหาวิทยาลัยมหิดล เป็นหลักสูตรระยะ 2 ปี แต่ละวิชาจะเปิดสอนทุกวันธรรมดา (จันทร์-ศุกร์) เป็นเวลาราว 2 สัปดาห์ จัดการเรียนการสอนเป็นภาษาอังกฤษโดยบุคลากรผู้เชี่ยวชาญในแต่ละแขนงของกลุ่มสาขาฯ และผู้เชี่ยวชาญจากต่างประเทศ หลักสูตรของกลุ่มสาขาฯ มีแกนหลักในการวางแผน การดำเนินงาน และการบริหารจัดการ พร้อมทั้งรายวิชาระบบรางที่มุ่งเน้นด้านต่างๆ ได้แก่ วิศวกรรมขนส่ง วิศวกรรมอุตสาหการและวัสดุ วิศวกรรมโยธา วิศวกรรมไฟฟ้า และวิศวกรรมเครื่องกล
หลักสูตร : วิศวกรรมศาสตรมหาบัณฑิต สาขาวิชาระบบขนส่งทางราง (หลักสูตรนานาชาติ)
จำนวนหน่วยกิต : ไม่น้อยกว่า ๓๖ หน่วยกิต
โครงสร้างหลักสูตร :
| หมวด | หน่วยกิต | |
| แผน ก แบบ ก ๒ | แผน ข | |
| หมวดวิชาบังคับ | ๑๕ | ๑๕ |
| หมวดวิชาเลือก ไม่น้อยกว่า | ๙ | ๑๕ |
| วิทยานิพนธ์ | ๑๒ | ๖ |
| จำนวนหน่วยกิตรวม ไม่น้อยกว่า | ๓๖ | ๓๖ |
อาชีพที่สามารถประกอบได้หลังสำเร็จการศึกษา
- วิศวกรวางแผนการเดินรถ
- วิศวกรซ่อมบำรุงระบบราง
- วิศวกรกรที่ปรึกษาด้านการวางแผนระบบขนส่งทางราง
- นักวิจัยระบบขนส่งทางราง
General Rubric
| Criteria | Skills | Fail (Unsatisfactory) | Pass (Need improvement) | Credit (Average) | Distinction (Above average) | Higher distinction (Excellent) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering morals and ethics in managing scientific and professional projects demonstrated | Ethics and morals (e.g. plagiarism, referencing) | Plagiarism issue, no referencing, lack of understanding of engineering morals and ethics | Various plagiarism and referencing issues occur, low level of understanding of engineering morals and ethics | Some plagiarism and referencing issues occur, sufficient level of engineering morals and ethics | Minor plagiarism or referencing issues, very good level of engineering morals and ethics demonstrated | No plagiarism or referencing issues, excellent ethics and morals demonstrated |
| Professionalism (e.g. advisors guidance, independence, subject standards) | Poor level of professionalism, lack of standards and no independence demonstrated | The level of professionalism needs improvement due to low standards and low independence | Above average level of independence and subject standards demonstrated | Minor plagiarism or referencing issues, very good level of engineering morals and ethics demonstrated | Excellent demonstration of guidance, independence and application of standards | |
| Rail system planning and management knowledge to solve railway problems applied | Application of subject knowledge | Unsatisfactory level of subject knowledge applied | Level of knowledge applied is low and needs a serious improvement | Average level of subject knowledge applied | Very good level of subject knowledge (as delivered in the course) applied | Excellent level of subject knowledge applied with some elements of additional knowledge presented |
| Research skills in developing further rail knowledge and proposing inventive ideas with positive impact on society displayed | Demonstration of research skills | Very poor research skills displayed, lack of understanding of subject knowledge | Quality of research skills is low and needs a serious improvement | Basic research skills demonstrated | Very good research skills and understanding of subject knowledge | Excellent research skills with some new applications and novelty demonstrated |
| Generation of inventive ideas | Lack of attempt to generate new ideas | Some ideas generated but of poor quality, not inventive | Some basic new ideas generated, but no innovation | Some new innovative ideas demonstrated but with limitations | New innovative ideas generated with confidence | |
| Independent and team work skills in applying analytical thinking to efficiently manage rail transport systems demonstrated | Independent work | Lack of independent analytical thinking related to the subject, various different issues occur unconsciously | Demonstration of independent analytical thinking related to the subject needs improvement, various issues occur | Average demonstration of independent analytical thinking related to the subject, some issues occur | Above average demonstration of independent analytical thinking related to the subject, minor issues | Excellent demonstration of independent analytical thinking related to the subject, no issues |
| Team work | Lack of team work effort and analytical thinking demonstrated, very poor division of tasks, no sense of a team work | Poor quality of team work demonstrated, e.g. various issues with communication, division of tasks and their delivery | Average team work skills demonstrated, some issues with communication, division of tasks and tasks’ delivery occur | Very good team work skills demonstrated, with clear division and delivery of tasks, but some minor issues occur | Excellent team work skills demonstrated, good division of tasks and excellent execution | |
| Effective communication of rail transport systems knowledge using variety of verbal and writing techniques addressed to different audiences | Effective verbal communication of subject knowledge | Very poor quality communication, e.g. unsatisfactory oral presentation | Verbal communication needs improvements, e.g. reading from slides, lack of clear explanations and logic, poor Q&A session | Average verbal communication skills with some issues related to e.g. reading from slides or lack of eye-contact with audience or some difficulty to handle Q&A session | Above average verbal communication with very good presentation and speaking skills but minor issues with clear explanations, contact with audience or handling Q&A session | Excellent verbal communication skills, including speaking skills, contact with audience, and Q&A session |
| Effective writing communication of subject knowledge | Very poor quality of written communication, e.g. very poor quality of a subject report , various different issues (e.g. no formatting, typos, different styles) occur unconsciously | Written communication needs serious improvements, various different issues (e.g. poor formatting, lack of logic, poor explanations, poor overall quality) | Average written communication skills with some issues related to e.g. formatting, style, work-flow | Above average written communication with very good writing skills but minor issues with e.g. formatting, style or work-flow | Excellent written communication skills, no issues |
